Difference between revisions of "Siesta"

From Polyphasic Sleep Wiki
m
m (add wikipedia links, minor rephrasing)
 
(35 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<languages/>
 +
<translate>
 +
</translate>
 
{{TNT|Siesta}}
 
{{TNT|Siesta}}
== Mechanism ==
+
<translate><!--T:1-->
Siesta sleep shares a lot of similarities with E1 - when research confirmed the existence of the '''circadian nadir''' around noon and early afternoon, both Siesta and E1 become very popular. However, it is most likely that humans naturally sleep in the non-reducing form of these schedules, meaning there is little to no sleep reduction involved. In the case of Siesta, a longer sleep in the nadir region is picked over the short nap of E1. Throughout the course of history, Siesta has been very common in Spain and many other countries around the world. In the context of polyphasic sleeping, Siesta contains 2 core sleeps, because the daytime sleep lasts for 1 full cycle, with much higher restorative power than a short nap. The longer daytime sleep paves the way for a shortened nocturnal sleep, which opens up for more evening time or earlier wake time in the morning. By having more than one core sleep, Siesta is capable of delivering very high sleep quality without compromising long-term health status. Like E1, a bigger portion of total sleep is dedicated to nighttime, where sleep pressure and the need to rest after a long day is often high, while the daytime sleep complements with a bit more sleep to fit into the circadian nadir. Usually, the wake gap from the end of the night core to the daytime core is anywhere '''between 6-9 hours'''.  
+
Siesta is a [[Special:MyLanguage/biphasic|biphasic]] schedule, which consists of a longer [[Special:MyLanguage/Cores|core]] at night and a shorter core during the day.
  
However, unlike most standard scheduling where a core sleep would make use of a multiple of the 90m sleep cycle, the reducing Siesta version (totaling 6.5h each day) utilizes a 5h core (rather than the would-be 4.5h core). This is because the +30m from a 4.5h core can act as a '''statistically likely REM period''', where there is more chance and more room to get extra REM sleep in this 30m duration. Similar to the 6.5h core  proposal of E1, it is expected that SWS has been fully covered in the first 3 full cycles of sleep (4.5h) with properly repartitioned sleep and high quality SWS from proper sleep hygiene. On monophasic sleep, the REM cycles in the morning do appear to become longer than 90m, so the 30m help sustain alertness better than a 4.5h core would. This small extension coupled with a daytime core would be equivalent to 4 full cycles from the E1 core.
+
== Origin == <!--T:2-->
  
== Difficulty ==
+
<!--T:3-->
Siesta over the years has reported a great amount of successful adaptations, with the majority coming from the non-reduced version. However, the standard version has overall less success, due to the sleep reduction mechanism that play into the adaptation. It is also likely that when adaptation first begins, waking up from the 5h core (rather than 4.5h) could be difficult with '''SWS wakes''' (SWS repartitioning in progress) or '''REM wakes''', due to in the statistically likely REM period. Over time, waking up from the main night core should no longer pose any serious problems, and waking up will become refreshing and invigorating. The daytime core is usually reported to be less challenging to manage, however, for those who are never used to sleeping this long in the daytime hours (or are only accustomed to napping for a short amount of time), it can still be difficult to first deal with the change in sleep habits. Overall, the adaptation progress is mild, if not easier than E1 in some cases. With good time management and a functional alarm setup, most individuals should be able to adapt to the reducing Siesta version.
+
Throughout history, Siesta has been a very common sleeping pattern in Spain and many other countries around the world. However, it is most likely that humans naturally sleep in the non-reducing form of these schedules, meaning there is little to no sleep reduction involved, and with more flexible sleep timings.
  
== Variants ==
+
== Mechanism == <!--T:4-->
Over the years, a lot of Siesta sleepers have adapted with non-standard variants, including reducing variants. The timing of the core sleeps also report diverse results. Therefore, beginners should look through the differences in the alternate scheduling variations before choosing the desired version to attempt.
 
  
=== Late core ===
+
<!--T:5-->
 +
Similar to [[Special:MyLanguage/E1|E1]], Siesta sleep takes advantage of the circadian dip around early afternoon. Siesta is considered to have 2 core sleeps, a long one at night and a short one in the day. In contrast to E1, the day core contains 1 full cycle, which is much more restorative than a short [[Special:MyLanguage/nap|nap]]. The longer daytime sleep also allows for a shortened nocturnal sleep. Usually, the wake gap from the end of the night [[Special:MyLanguage/core|core]]to the daytime core can be between 6-9 hours.
  
[[File:Siesta Late Core.png|center|thumb|Siesta with late night core]]
+
<!--T:6-->
Over the years there have been a couple successful attempts with this Siesta variant. The main idea behind this setup is to allow a long wake gap during the day, which suits 9-to-5 mainstream occupations and allows the viability to schedule siesta. A sleeper would have a core at night (albeit much shorter than the usually recommended 7-9h monophasic core), and then a long sleep block to rejuvenate after work. The convenience of this schedule would be a lot of wake time around the evening and up to late night hours. The enhanced mobility of scheduling this variant is also satisfying for many lifestyles.  
+
However, unlike most standard scheduling where a core sleep would make use of a multiple of the 90m sleep cycle, the standard reducing Siesta (6.5h total) utilizes a 5h core, because last 30 m is likely to contain extra [[wikipedia:Rapid_eye_movement_sleep|REM]] sleep. Based on the typical human sleep structure, it is expected that [[wikipedia:Slow-wave_sleep|SWS]] would be almost, if not fully covered in the first 3 full cycles of sleep (4.5h). On [[Special:MyLanguage/monophasic|monophasic]] sleep, the REM cycles are often longer than 90 m, so the 30 m may also help with waking up after completed sleep cycles.
  
Despite the advantages, adaptations to this variant are often remarked to be more challenging than to the default version, because shifting the main sleep way out of the SWS peak will often require strong management of food, exercise and dark period to ensure a sufficient amount of SWS. Those with lower SWS requirements will hugely benefit from this setup, as it allows late bedtime and early wakeup time at the same time. The daytime core, being pushed to much later in the afternoon suits the natural tendency of longer sleep as SWS peak (evening hours) draws closer. This core can be pushed all the way to '''~7:30 PM and ends at 9 PM''' in another successful example. It may also be socially intrusive in a way that this long daytime sleep may interfere with other commitments after work.
+
== Adaptation== <!--T:7-->
  
=== Slightly modified core length ===
+
<!--T:8-->
 +
It is likely that during parts of adaptation, waking up from the core could be difficult because of '''SWS wakes''' (SWS repartitioning in progress) or '''REM wakes'''. Over time, waking up will become refreshing. The daytime core is usually reported to be less challenging to manage. However, for those unaccustomed to sleeping this long in the day, it could require learning and adjustment.
  
[[File:Siesta 5.png|center|thumb|A Siesta with a 5.5h night core]]
+
== Difficulty == <!--T:9-->
There has been only one notable case that has adapted to a 5.5h night core. Since there is still a small chance of SWS wakes during adaptation or in the case of high SWS requirements, adapting to this variant is not recommended. The advantage of this core length may benefit high REM requirements, and buffing the total sleep to a safer amount for ~17-18-year-old individuals. The additional 30m may yield a longer period of wakefulness and the daytime sleep can be delayed further.
 
[[File:Siesta 4.png|center|thumb|A Siesta with a 4.5h night core]]
 
This Siesta variant would line up with the 90m cycle scheduling rule, however, so far it has reported much less success than the standard version. It is alleged that people with slightly lower monophasic requirements (e.g, 7h) would have a comfortable time adapting to this variant. However, it is also very possible that after adapting to the default Siesta version, the night core can naturally shorten down to 4.5h, but it does not happen very often. With some amount of extra sleep, it is possible to attempt this version if one wants to rake in a bit more extra time during emergency events.
 
  
=== Night core extension ===
+
<!--T:10-->
 +
Over the years, Siesta has reported great success, with the majority being with the non-reduced version. However, the standard reducing version has less success, due to the need of an adaptation to reduced sleep. Overall, the adaptation is relatively mild. It could be easier than E1 in some cases. With good time management and a functional alarm setup, most individuals should be able to adapt to the reducing Siesta version.
  
[[File:Siesta-extended 1.png|center|thumb|Version 1 of Siesta extended]]
+
== Lifestyle considerations == <!--T:11-->
This variant also sees a lot of success, mostly in people with active lifestyles or are still growing mentally and physically. The adaptation difficulty is much milder than the default version, and extending the night core follows the 90m cycle rule (mostly for convenience). This extended version still gives a decent amount of sleep reduction for people whose monophasic need is around 9h each day. The most common form of scheduling this setup is to have a slightly longer core at night and keep the daytime core as it is. However, the night core can still be further extended, which would raise the total sleep higher and become '''non-reducing Siesta''' (no sleep reduction from monophasic) if it is preferred. An example would be a 6.5-7h night core, and a 90m daytime sleep for an individual with ~8-9h monophasic baseline.
 
  
=== Daytime core extension ===
+
<!--T:12-->
[[File:Siesta-extended 2.png|center|thumb|Version 2 of Siesta-extended]]
+
Siesta sleep is overall a popular schedule, though it is significantly less popular than E1. First, managing a daytime core can be difficult, in comparison to the 20 minute nap on E1. However, recent trends of working from home or flexible school/work hours are making Siesta achievable for many. Another issue is that food time needs to be scheduled either right after the day core, or a few hours before it to ensure its quality. However, there is more leeway in scheduling meals with the daytime core on [[Special:MyLanguage/#variants|extended]] versions, as the total sleep time is higher. After adaptation, the whole schedule can become flexible by flexing one or both core sleeps with small increments.  
Contrary to the first version of Siesta-extended, this version surprisingly scores some successes thus far, but with a stranger distribution of sleep that looks almost like Segmented sleep. Sleepers who would resort to this variant likely have work hours at night of some sort, and other commitments in the evening. As a result, the night core is often cut short, hence the extension of the daytime core by a full cycle. Ideally in this setup, the dark period would start 1.5-2h before the night core, and resume until ~1.5-2h after the night core to stabilize the circadian rhythm with a solid dark period. Without proper dark period management (e.g, shift work, rotation work hours), it is tremendously difficult to make this variant work, however.  
 
  
=== Shortened daytime core/Non-reducing variant ===
+
<!--T:13-->
[[File:Non-reducing Siesta.png|center|thumb|A non-reducing Siesta variant]]
+
Siesta (especially extended) is often done by athletes who perform intense exercises. Roger Federer and Usain Bolt are two of the many athletes who are known to habitually take a long sleep in the day. The day core provides recovery after an intense workout session, granting extra sleep time to meet the increased SWS requirement. It has been shown that after an endurance training session, SWS pressure rises and a daytime core allows SWS to be gained<ref name="a" />. The occurrence of SWS in the long siesta is said to release the growth hormone (GH), which regulates glucose levels and glycogen storage, which often become depleted under intense exercise sessions.
A 60m sleep block is usually discouraged for attempting under most, if not all, polyphasic patterns. However, under '''non-reducing condition''', it can be natural to wake up after 60m rather than a full 90m core. 60m sleeps have been anecdotally researched and tried by a couple of polyphasic sleepers over the years who often naturally fall back to this seemingly "odd" sleep duration. The reason is that the 60m sleep duration provides mostly SWS and the sleeper would likely wake up during the transitional light sleep stage, before the usual REM sleep block would enter. Under non-repartitioned sleep, all sleep cycles follow the regular order, in which NREM1 initiates the cycle, followed by NREM2 (starting to actually fall asleep), SWS (deep sleep, unaware of the surrounding), NREM2 (transition stage) and finally REM sleep. The body at this point has completed the required amount of vital sleep in the day and naturally wakes up, without compressing the core sleeps. However, outside of non-reducing condition, a 60m sleep block should not be scheduled from the start.  
 
  
Another great boon of non-reducing version is that sleepers do not have to be confined to a specific duration of daytime core length, as long as it's no shorter than ~50m (to differentiate with E1). and can be as long as ~2h. Thus, non-reducing Siesta has a lot of flexibility in scheduling, and heavily favors natural wakes (e.g, 60m daytime core one day, and ~80-90m core the next day). It is also not a requirement to sleep at the exact same hours everyday for both sleeps even when adapting (though consistency of sleep times is great). The goal is to ensure there is no sleep reduction from monophasic baseline to get as much productivity during the day as possible (for events or circumstances that require sharp decision-making and/or focus like examinations).
+
<!--T:14-->
 +
On another note, Siesta-like sleep patterns is also known to be an adaptation of humans to diseases<ref name="b" /> (including chronic infectious diseases). Humans generally sleep more when severely sick, and often in a way resembling extended variants of Siesta, where both core sleeps are much longer than usual to allow for cognitive and physical recovery from sickness.  
  
== Lifestyle considerations ==
+
</translate>
Siesta sleep has long been considered a golden sleep schedule due to its prevalence and astoundingly well-rounded core sleeps. However, due to the hectic lifestyles today, managing a daytime core is very difficult. This in return decreases the popularity of Siesta and it pales in comparison with its counterpart E1. However, work-from-home or flexible school/work hours can enable the Siesta daytime core to put in work. Another downside is that food time should be properly scheduled in relation to the daytime core on '''the standard or any reducing versions''', which is recommended to be right after the core, or a few hours before it to ensure its quality. However, there is more leeway in scheduling meals with the daytime core on '''extended and non-reducing''' versions, since total sleep is high enough. Over the years a lot of polyphasic sleepers have attempted Siesta, despite its inherently disadvantageous daytime core compared to the daytime nap of E1 and have enjoyed their success. After adaptation, the whole schedule can become flexible by flexing one or both core sleeps with small increments.
+
<span id="variants"></span>
 +
<translate>
 +
== Variants == <!--T:15-->
  
However, Siesta (especially extended version) is often known to be the '''most popular and viable polyphasic pattern for athletes''' who often perform physically taxing tasks. Roger Federer and Usain Bolt are two of the many athletes who are known to habitually take a long siesta. The secondary core sleep provides more intensive recovery after an intense workout session, effectively granting another opportunity at recovery to meet the increased SWS requirement. It has been researched that [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20308699/ after an endurance training session, SWS pressure rises] a longer sleep will facilitate SWS. The occurrence of SWS in the long siesta is said to release the growth hormone (GH) regulate glucose levels and glycogen storage as these storages often become depleted under a long and intense exercise session. All in all, the vital functions of the secondary core sleep in assisting the recovery period after exertion is invaluable.  
+
<!--T:16-->
 +
Over the years, many Siesta sleepers have adapted to non-standard variants, including alternative reducing ones. The timing of the core sleeps also reported mixed results. Beginners should also look through the differences in the alternate scheduling variations before choosing the desired one to attempt.
  
On another note, Siesta sleep is also known to be an [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26193476/ adaptation of humans to diseases] (including chronic infectious diseases in the study). It seems to make sense that humans sleep for longer periods in a row when severely sick, and with extended core sleeps, it starkly reminds of the non-reducing Siesta version, where both core sleeps last for much longer than usual as a demand for cognitive and physical recovery from sickness. Being a holistically comprehensive schedule, Siesta is one of the best polyphasic schedules that can meet many critical well-being requirements if daily scheduling would give room for it to shine.
+
=== Late core === <!--T:17-->
  
 +
<!--T:18-->
 +
[[File:Siesta Late Core.png|right|thumb|Siesta with late night core]]
 +
Over the years there a few successful attempts with this variant. The main idea behind this setup is to allow a longer wake gap in the day to suit 9-to-5 jobs. A sleeper would have a core at night, go to work, and then a long sleep block to rejuvenate after work. The advantages of this schedule includes time awake in the evening and night hours. For this reason, this variant can accommodate for many lifestyles.
 +
 +
<!--T:19-->
 +
Despite the advantages, adaptations to this variant are known to be harder than the default version, because shifting the main sleep away from the SWS peak will require management of food, exercise and lighting to ensure a sufficient amount of SWS. (See also: [[Special:MyLanguage/dark period|dark period]]) Those with lower SWS requirements will likely find this easier. The short core is pushed much later into the afternoon and early evening. This core may start as late as 19:30. Even so, however, it may be still be socially intrusive.
 +
 +
=== Slightly modified core length === <!--T:20-->
 +
 +
<!--T:21-->
 +
[[File:Siesta 4.png|right|thumb|Siesta with alternative core lengths]]
 +
One individual has adapted to a 5.5h night core. Since this core length increase the likelihood of SWS wakes, the night core extension is preferred over this. However, it may benefit those with higher REM requirements. The additional 30m may also allow a longer gap between the morning wake and the daytime core.
 +
 +
<!--T:22-->
 +
The second Siesta variant with a 4.5h night core would line up with the 90m cycle scheduling rule. However, so far it has reported much less success than the standard version. People with slightly lower monophasic requirements (e.g, 7h) might be able to adapt to this variant. Note that after adapting to the default Siesta version, the night core may sometimes naturally shorten to 4.5h, but it does not happen very often.
 +
 +
=== Night core extension === <!--T:23-->
 +
 +
<!--T:24-->
 +
[[File:Siesta-extended 1.png|right|thumb|Siesta with extended night core]]
 +
This variant also sees a lot of success, mostly in people with active lifestyles or are still growing. The adaptation is far easier than the default one, and the extended night core follows the 90m cycle rule. This still gives some sleep reduction for people with high monophasic needs. The most common form of scheduling this setup is to have a slightly longer core at night and keep the daytime core as it is. However, the night core can still be extended further, and the schedule becomes non-reducing (i.e. no sleep reduction from monophasic). An example would be a 6.5-7h night core, and a 90m daytime sleep for an individual with ~8-9h monophasic baseline. For those with a monophasic baseline similar to the total on this variant, it can be substantially more flexible, even during adaptation.
 +
 +
=== Day core extension === <!--T:25-->
 +
 +
<!--T:26-->
 +
[[File:Siesta-extended 2.png|right|thumb|Siesta with extended day core]]
 +
This variant, which resembles [[Special:MyLanguage/Segmented|Segmented]], has also seen some success. This is often done by those who work evening shifts. In this setup, the [[Special:MyLanguage/dark period|dark period]] should start 1.5-3h before the night core, and continue until ~1.5-2h after the night core to stabilize the circadian rhythm. This setup might require additional [[Special:MyLanguage/circadian management|circadian management]] to keep the circadian rhythm stable, as the longer daytime core may cause the body to mistaken it for a nighttime sleep.
 +
 +
==References== <!--T:27-->
 +
 +
<!--T:28-->
 +
{{reflist|refs=
 +
<ref name="a">{{cite journal |vauthors=Davies DJ, Graham KS, Chow CM |date=2010 |title=The effect of prior endurance training on nap sleep patterns |journal=International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=87-97 |doi=10.1123/ijspp.5.1.87}}</ref>
 +
<ref name="b">{{cite journal |vauthors=Barone TL |date=2000 |title=Is the siesta an adaptation to disease? : A cross-cultural examination |journal=Human Nature |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=233-258 |doi=10.1007/s12110-000-1012-4}}</ref>
 +
}}
 +
 +
<!--T:29-->
 
[[Category:Schedules]]
 
[[Category:Schedules]]
 +
</translate>
 
{{TNT|Polyphasic Sleep Schedules}}
 
{{TNT|Polyphasic Sleep Schedules}}
 +
<translate>
 +
</translate>

Latest revision as of 22:38, 16 January 2021

Other languages:
English • ‎русский
Siesta
Siesta
chart link

Total sleep6 hours 30 minutes
Proposed byNone, used by humans throughout history.
DifficultyModerate
Specification1 long core sleep, 1 daytime short core

Siesta is a biphasic schedule, which consists of a longer core at night and a shorter core during the day.

Origin

Throughout history, Siesta has been a very common sleeping pattern in Spain and many other countries around the world. However, it is most likely that humans naturally sleep in the non-reducing form of these schedules, meaning there is little to no sleep reduction involved, and with more flexible sleep timings.

Mechanism

Similar to E1, Siesta sleep takes advantage of the circadian dip around early afternoon. Siesta is considered to have 2 core sleeps, a long one at night and a short one in the day. In contrast to E1, the day core contains 1 full cycle, which is much more restorative than a short nap. The longer daytime sleep also allows for a shortened nocturnal sleep. Usually, the wake gap from the end of the night coreto the daytime core can be between 6-9 hours.

However, unlike most standard scheduling where a core sleep would make use of a multiple of the 90m sleep cycle, the standard reducing Siesta (6.5h total) utilizes a 5h core, because last 30 m is likely to contain extra REM sleep. Based on the typical human sleep structure, it is expected that SWS would be almost, if not fully covered in the first 3 full cycles of sleep (4.5h). On monophasic sleep, the REM cycles are often longer than 90 m, so the 30 m may also help with waking up after completed sleep cycles.

Adaptation

It is likely that during parts of adaptation, waking up from the core could be difficult because of SWS wakes (SWS repartitioning in progress) or REM wakes. Over time, waking up will become refreshing. The daytime core is usually reported to be less challenging to manage. However, for those unaccustomed to sleeping this long in the day, it could require learning and adjustment.

Difficulty

Over the years, Siesta has reported great success, with the majority being with the non-reduced version. However, the standard reducing version has less success, due to the need of an adaptation to reduced sleep. Overall, the adaptation is relatively mild. It could be easier than E1 in some cases. With good time management and a functional alarm setup, most individuals should be able to adapt to the reducing Siesta version.

Lifestyle considerations

Siesta sleep is overall a popular schedule, though it is significantly less popular than E1. First, managing a daytime core can be difficult, in comparison to the 20 minute nap on E1. However, recent trends of working from home or flexible school/work hours are making Siesta achievable for many. Another issue is that food time needs to be scheduled either right after the day core, or a few hours before it to ensure its quality. However, there is more leeway in scheduling meals with the daytime core on extended versions, as the total sleep time is higher. After adaptation, the whole schedule can become flexible by flexing one or both core sleeps with small increments.

Siesta (especially extended) is often done by athletes who perform intense exercises. Roger Federer and Usain Bolt are two of the many athletes who are known to habitually take a long sleep in the day. The day core provides recovery after an intense workout session, granting extra sleep time to meet the increased SWS requirement. It has been shown that after an endurance training session, SWS pressure rises and a daytime core allows SWS to be gained[1]. The occurrence of SWS in the long siesta is said to release the growth hormone (GH), which regulates glucose levels and glycogen storage, which often become depleted under intense exercise sessions.

On another note, Siesta-like sleep patterns is also known to be an adaptation of humans to diseases[2] (including chronic infectious diseases). Humans generally sleep more when severely sick, and often in a way resembling extended variants of Siesta, where both core sleeps are much longer than usual to allow for cognitive and physical recovery from sickness.

Variants

Over the years, many Siesta sleepers have adapted to non-standard variants, including alternative reducing ones. The timing of the core sleeps also reported mixed results. Beginners should also look through the differences in the alternate scheduling variations before choosing the desired one to attempt.

Late core

Siesta with late night core

Over the years there a few successful attempts with this variant. The main idea behind this setup is to allow a longer wake gap in the day to suit 9-to-5 jobs. A sleeper would have a core at night, go to work, and then a long sleep block to rejuvenate after work. The advantages of this schedule includes time awake in the evening and night hours. For this reason, this variant can accommodate for many lifestyles.

Despite the advantages, adaptations to this variant are known to be harder than the default version, because shifting the main sleep away from the SWS peak will require management of food, exercise and lighting to ensure a sufficient amount of SWS. (See also: dark period) Those with lower SWS requirements will likely find this easier. The short core is pushed much later into the afternoon and early evening. This core may start as late as 19:30. Even so, however, it may be still be socially intrusive.

Slightly modified core length

Siesta with alternative core lengths

One individual has adapted to a 5.5h night core. Since this core length increase the likelihood of SWS wakes, the night core extension is preferred over this. However, it may benefit those with higher REM requirements. The additional 30m may also allow a longer gap between the morning wake and the daytime core.

The second Siesta variant with a 4.5h night core would line up with the 90m cycle scheduling rule. However, so far it has reported much less success than the standard version. People with slightly lower monophasic requirements (e.g, 7h) might be able to adapt to this variant. Note that after adapting to the default Siesta version, the night core may sometimes naturally shorten to 4.5h, but it does not happen very often.

Night core extension

Siesta with extended night core

This variant also sees a lot of success, mostly in people with active lifestyles or are still growing. The adaptation is far easier than the default one, and the extended night core follows the 90m cycle rule. This still gives some sleep reduction for people with high monophasic needs. The most common form of scheduling this setup is to have a slightly longer core at night and keep the daytime core as it is. However, the night core can still be extended further, and the schedule becomes non-reducing (i.e. no sleep reduction from monophasic). An example would be a 6.5-7h night core, and a 90m daytime sleep for an individual with ~8-9h monophasic baseline. For those with a monophasic baseline similar to the total on this variant, it can be substantially more flexible, even during adaptation.

Day core extension

Siesta with extended day core

This variant, which resembles Segmented, has also seen some success. This is often done by those who work evening shifts. In this setup, the dark period should start 1.5-3h before the night core, and continue until ~1.5-2h after the night core to stabilize the circadian rhythm. This setup might require additional circadian management to keep the circadian rhythm stable, as the longer daytime core may cause the body to mistaken it for a nighttime sleep.

References

  1. Davies DJ, Graham KS, Chow CM (2010). "The effect of prior endurance training on nap sleep patterns". International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 5 (1): 87–97. doi:10.1123/ijspp.5.1.87.
  2. Barone TL (2000). "Is the siesta an adaptation to disease? : A cross-cultural examination". Human Nature. 11 (3): 233–258. doi:10.1007/s12110-000-1012-4.